Posted on 13 July, 2020 by majikthyse
One thing leads to another, and with each step I am angrier. It started with a Twitter tip-off about a video on Facebook recommending homeopathy for coronavirus symptoms. Of course, homeopathic remedies are prescribed totally on the basis of symptoms, as homeopaths have no way of knowing any better, so nothing remarkable about that as such. But the video was made by Dr Elizabeth Thompson, a registered medical doctor, and apparently a consultant at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trust. I am not on Facebook and have no desire to be, and the video may have gone now. But it popped up at the same time at the National Centre for Integrative Medicine. At this point I need to explain a bit of history.
Continue reading →
Like this:
Like Loading...
Filed under: Uncategorized | Tagged: Advertising Standards Authority, general medical council, homeopathy | 6 Comments »
Posted on 20 October, 2017 by majikthyse
I have for some time been critical of the GMC’s acquiescence over doctors who practise quackery, but I’m concerned now at how it seems to be getting into bed with them. I just came across an `oncologist and professor of Chinese medicine‘ and phoned the GMC for advice as to whether they would regulate such a person – who is not apparently registered to practise in the UK. It was an odd conversation, which I have followed up with this email to the GMC: Continue reading →
Like this:
Like Loading...
Filed under: Alternative medicine, Evidence-based medicine, Homeopathy, Medical regulation | Tagged: general medical council, herbal medicine, homeopathy | 2 Comments »
Posted on 19 September, 2013 by majikthyse
Around the end of 2012 I was alerted to the claims which Dr Jessica Middleton was making on her website, which she calls The Natural Doctor. A central issue was that Dr Middleton (now Dr Braid – see below) was clearly trading as a medical doctor, as evidenced by the name of her business, and the use of her medical degrees on the opening page of the site. However she does not practise anything which might be called conventional medicine, preferring to offer a wide range of diagnostics and `treatments’ which mostly lack robust evidence. I don’t intend to provide a detailed critique of what is on offer, as my purpose with this post is to explore how such a doctor is regulated. Meanwhile, I’m sure some of you will have your own views about an apparently intelligent young woman who was extensively educated in medicine, to a large extent at public expense, and now chooses not to utilise any of that training in service to the public.
Continue reading →
Like this:
Like Loading...
Filed under: Alternative medicine, Clinical trials, Education, Evidence-based medicine, Medical regulation | Tagged: Alternative medicine, dr middleton, general medical council | 16 Comments »