A Plethora of Fallacies

I am indebted to the moderately well known irrational American physician Dr Frank Lipman for drawing together most of the commonly held misconceptions about real medicine. He writes regularly for a generally ethical and altrustic website, which naturally tends to attract a very wide range of views, sadly rather more irrational ones than I would like. Anyway, Lipman gives me the opportunity to address all of his strange claims in one place. Here are the 18 things he says are wrong with modern medicine, with my answers.

1. Modern Western Medicine is based on a narrow “scientific” model, and arrogantly ignores and rejects therapies and entire medical systems that don’t fit this model.

Science is not just a model, it is the only reliable method we have of discovering the truth about the universe. It is underpinned by evidence. Scientists do not arrogantly reject anything that doesn’t fit the model, they simply ask for evidence. If evidence is not available, we can’t accept the claim. Science is not narrow, it is broad enough for the entire universe. It works for everything else. If it doesn’t work for certain “medical systems”, does that not tell us something?

2. Doctors are trained in hospitals in “crisis care” medicine, not to take care of the “walking wounded,” which is the majority of people. They need to be trained to take of (sic) the “walking wounded” as well.

What does he mean by the “walking wounded”? What is “crisis care”? Are there no doctors who specialise in chronic diseases? I can’t speak for the US medical system, but I do know that the biggest worry over there is long term care of the chronically ill – hardly the “walking wounded”. Perhaps he means the “worried well”.

3. Instead of treating the underlying causes or imbalances, Doctors often merely manage symptoms.

So we don’t bother to learn about cell surface receptors, immune abnormalities, bacterial sensitivities and a host of other fundamental components of disease? Molecular biology tells us that many diseases are caused by genetic mutations. All these sound like underlying causes to me. But perhaps Lipman’s `causes’ are imaginary concepts such `yin’ and `yang’. I wonder what he thinks is out of balance. How does he measure it? Is it reproducible?

4. Symptoms are seen as something to be suppressed rather than a pointer to some underlying imbalance.

Not true. Symptoms are signposts to what has gone wrong. Doctors are trained in diagnosis, not simply to get rid of symptoms. In reality the homeopaths are the ones who are obsessed with symptoms. Again, what is out of balance? Show it to me. But ah, I am not admitted to the fold of those who are granted the wisdom to see.

5. Doctors see the human body as a machine with separate parts that can be treated independently rather than as an integrated whole. In addition the mind and body are also seen as separate independent entities and emotions are often ignored.

This is incredibly out of date. If doctors treated the body like this they would not do a full physical examination or take a full history – they would only look at the current disease. The mind-body dichotomy has been found to be a non-problem, as the mind is an emergent property of the brain.

6. Man is not seen as part of nature, and how what happens in nature effects (sic) humans.

What on earth does this mean? Of course doctors look for environmental causes of disease. That is a major focus in immunology and respiratory medicine, for example.

7. We look for a magic bullet instead of all the possible factors that make up the total load which are causing the underlying imbalance. There is no understanding of the total load.

Not true. See my comments in 5 above. What does `total load’ mean? Without explanation it is meaningless.

8. No belief that the body has a self-healing capacity and no ways to boost that capacity.

Not true. Doctors know that a great many diseases are self-limiting, so in such cases they just make the patient comfortable and wait for nature to take its course. There are many examples of “boosting self-healing capacity”, such as immunomodulation. What do antibiotics do? They do not repair any tissue damage, they stop more damage happening and the body takes over.

9. Everyone with the same disease gets treated the same way, patient uniqueness ignored.

This is really iniquitous rubbish. See my comment in 5 above about taking histories and doing physical exams.

10. We treat the disease, not the patient.

Rubbish again – see 5 above. Even highly specialised doctors collect information on all possible health factors for each patient. In any case if the patient has no disease would you still treat them? Obviously the disease is the reason for treatment.

11. There is a reliance on numbers and tests rather than how the patient is feeling and what is found on examination.

Hmm…. so all that work on rating scales in psychology, and multitudinous quality of life questionnaires, never happened?

12. We don’t take into account the importance of diet and lifestyle on health. How could we? We get a total of 6-8 hours of nutrition lectures in medical school.

Well again I can’t speak for the US system, and I would be interested in readers’ comments on the truth of this statement. But I do know that UK medical training includes substantial modules on nutrition. Otherwise I am not sure why we would have professors of nutrition and so many nutritionists and dieticians in the NHS.

13. We don’t recognize or understand the correct use of supplements to optimize health.

Here speaks a dupe of the multi-billion dollar supplements industry. Any qualified medical biochemist and nutritionist will tell you that supplements are unnecessary for normal people taking a healthy diet.

14. We don’t recognize the importance of toxicity on our bodies nor know how to boost the body’s own detoxification systems.

So toxicology as a specialism doesn’t exist? We know nothing about clearance pathways? Pull the other one.

15. The Doctor patient relationship is not emphasized and the role of the patient as a partner in their own health care not encouraged.

This is the first one with a grain of truth in it. However the old days of paternalistic medicine employed the worst of relationships, and that is now changing. Many studies have shown that spending time with patients gets them to comply with their treatment much better, and they have better health outcomes and lower health care costs. But the important thing is that this works even if the person spending the time is not the doctor, but someone else such as the pharmacist.

16. The placebo has a negative connotation and ignored. The placebo is really the body healing itself and should be encouraged.

Wrong. There have never been any decent studies to show a healing effect of placebo. It is only an effect of perception, which is why it works best for pain.

17. The Drug Industry is too enmeshed in the medical system The Pharmaceutical Industry has WAY TOO MUCH power and is “bribing” Doctors to use their drugs and researchers to produce positive results for their drugs.

Partly true – but again this is from a US perspective. Yes, there is a problem of bias in the reporting of clinical trials, but bribery is a serious allegation that needs evidence. Lipman obviously has no idea at all of the level of regulatory scrutiny exercised by the FDA.

18. More than 80 percent of all medical treatments used have been untested by rigorous peer reviewed study, yet the Medical establishment insists that alternative health treatments must undergo these before they can be used. The system of evaluation needs to be changed.

He doesn’t say where he is getting the 80% figure from, and it may not be true. However, the first point is that, where the outcome is not in doubt, you don’t need to do any rigorous studies. Would you do them for splinting broken legs, or for tying off a severed femoral artery? The second point is that alternative medicine is called that because all of it is in doubt. Well I should qualify that. The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM), operated by the NIH, spent over a billion dollars on rigorously researching CAM and came up with no clearly beneficial treatments. So it isn’t quite the case that CAM is waiting to be tested. It has been tested and has mostly been found to be ineffective. Presumably Lipman wants the evaluation system to be changed until it gives him the result he wants.

Well overall, this is the litany of the pseudo-medicine fraternity. We see it continuously, yet there is never any real evidence to underly any of it. The idea seems to be that the more times it is said, the truer it will be. Someone else thought something rather like that. Well not quite like it, because he declared that the bigger the lie, and the more it was repeated, the more people would believe it. He never said that he believed it himself, so maybe he wasn’t as self-deluded as the likes of Dr Lipman seem to be. His name was Joseph Goebbels.


5 Responses

  1. Good points. With regard to your first point, I would add that medical education in the UK centres on the ‘biopsychosocial’ model, to the extent that some are beginning to fear that there is not enough ‘biomedicine’! This relates to other points too. In addition, evidence based medicine as defined by its originators explicitly requires consideration of the individual patient, and the patient’s values, in determining the course of treatment. Lipman’s platoon of straw men has no intellectual firepower.

  2. good article, liked it

  3. I came upon this blog, but I must say I am very happy to have had the opportunity to read and make my comments
    I consider this article very interesting and rich in content, would also be very nice to discuss issues that are present in this paper.
    They still agree with what you said and I believe we can always find new ideas for improvement.
    Thank you very much to enable the vision of my post.Se have the desire to see the contents of my site, you are welcome, welcome advice on how to make it better. My intention is to become the largest in the world. I’m also trying to do it in English with less grammatical errors can
    thanks again

    Dott.Lorenzo Dall’Olio
    Usui and Karuna Reiki Master

  4. You can’t compare UK’s medical system to the US’. Over there Dr. Lipman’s observations have been MY observations as well. My mom has been dealing with several chronic illnesses (obesity, diabetes and nerve damage and arthritis) and moderate to severe pain from them for years, not to mention she also suffered from chronic headaches, severe abdominal cramps, severe inflammation, insomnia, constipation and lethargy. She went to dozens of doctors over the years, specialists and so on and all of them kept prescribing her drugs, drugs and more drugs. My mom was chronically fatigue and always uncomfortable.. I sat down and really got to understand all her underlying issues, wrote done symptoms and when they occurred, what she was eating and soon figured out on my own without any medical degree (I’m a counselor) she was probably intolerant of wheat and wheat gluten and nutrient deficient as well because she didn’t have teeth and hated wearing dentures, so she could not MASTICATE her veggies like he needed to promote her body’s ability to absorb micro-nutrients from foods. So, I bought her a juicer and began her juicing daily to replace nutrients (minerals and vitamins) she was not getting. I got my mom to start eating a plant based diet (65% raw) with very small amounts of lean meats every once an a while (less than 5% of her weekly food intake). And I got her to give up all wheat products including breads. For pasta, I bought her rice pasta and started to instruct her on WHOLE GRAIN consumption instead of degermanted grains as she had been eating. I took all the prepackaged food OUT her house and began cooking for her all her meals along with taking her out to walk a bit each day. Within 2 weeks she lost 10 pounds and her headaches (which she had been having off and on for 20 years) stopped. She abdominal cramps stopped which she had had for over 2 years. Her arthritis pains severely reduced, her back pains begin to fade away. Her inflammation which was ALL in her body to the point that the doctors prescribed her anti-inflammatory got better which in turn helped her heart rate. Her high blood pressured lowered and her glucose levels stabilized to the point where she could stop taking one of the two medication she was taking for diabetes and lower her insulin injection levels by 75%. After 2 months she no longer needed any diabetes medication nor insulin and her pains were pretty much gone. Now, this all took 2 months on a changed diet or fresh foods, nutrient rich juices and exercise and NONE of this was advocated of any great measure by any of her doctors besides the passive comment to exercise more or eat LESS carbohydrates. None of these doctors could see she was wheat intolerant either, which really disgust me. But what happened right when we began this journey for health is what made me realize that American medicine and doctors are not able to a large part to treat chronic illnesses.

    Well, right when we began the juicing she was nutrient deficient. Her kidney doctor prescribed her potassium pills to which she told him she didn’t want to take them and he told her she needed to. Well, she’s eating a diet RICH in all her needed electrolytes and now that she’s juicing she’s getting plenty of potassium. Because her kidneys are not the best her nutrient rich diet along with potassium pills caused an issue: hyperkalemia. Well, she had to go to the emergency room because her potassium was SO high and they feared it caused heart and kidney problems. When she talked to the doctor who prescribed her the potassium pills only 2 weeks BEFORE this problem occurred, he actually had the NERVE to blame her eating a healthy plant based diet and juicing on her having such high potassium levels in her blood!!!! He didn’t seem to think it was the potassium pills he guilted her to take, but said the nutrient rich whole fresh vegetables was what made her SICK!!! That was the most telling and disgusting moment I have ever experienced with modern medicine and it told me right then and there that these people can’t admit when they’re wrong and to blame a healthy lifestyle on her renal failure and NOT the pharmacological CRAP they got her to take was all I needed to know that they are so concerned with their view of how to do things they overlook BASIC things that can save lives and discomfort. My mother is feeling better now than she has in 20 years and it’s NOT because modern medicine. IT was because I listened to her, listened to her body and did all we could to allow her body to heal itself DESPITE what them doctors have been doing to her for years. She walks with me around this field. Do you have any idea how that feels for me to see my mother happy, not in pain walking after years of barley being able to walk a few steps without severe pain? So fuck modern medicine and the doctors who practice it! If you have trauma or a crisis situation, they are amazing at what they do, but if you have food intolerances or chronic diseases, they can’t fix shit! They will just patch you up a bit, and suppress the symptoms NOT the underlining illness. So don’t compare UK to America. I don’t know how you people do it over there but over here we spend more money than ANY OTHER COUNTRY on our medical system yet we die more from cancer and heart disease related illnesses than anyone else and I’m opting out. I chose to live a healthy lifestyle and LISTEN to my body and if I have trauma I will go to a medical doctor, but they too in-bed with big phrama to actually do anything for me besides prescribe me a pill. And I’ve seen with my mom’s declining health over the last 20 years exactly what that crap does for you.

    • I agree that the US system is different from the UK’s. I am pleased to hear that your mother is doing better now. But always remember that anecdotes are not evidence. Even within the US system, there are lots of good quality studies which show that drug treatment reduces health care costs. Basically, if people are prescribed drugs and don’t take them, they do worse that those who do. They go into hospital more, they lose more time at work, they often die earlier. What is not well understood is that all treatment carries risk. It is very easy to total up all the problems that inevitably attend medical treatment, and thus condemn it, without considering the benefits. What medicines regulators have to do is to assess the risk:benefit ratio, and the cost-effectiveness. These are sophisticated sciences and have nothing to do with individual anecdotes. But nobody thinks there is no room for improvement. There are many many problems and abuses within all health care systems, but to say that pharmaceuticals are crap is an insult to armies of people who dedicate their working lives to improving your health. What they do is science, and I suggest you go and learn some of that, instead of using offensive words.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: